tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5310407.post4623125187234211996..comments2009-05-27T21:56:55.813+01:00themightychewhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15825891396769394628noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5310407.post-29678882114717205252009-05-27T21:56:55.813+01:002009-05-27T21:56:55.813+01:00I know what you mean. Subconsciously I couldn't say that I'm <I>not</I> primed to look for them, but they are never forced. Really, what I don't have is any comparison; any control group or individual to judge against. I don't feel that I instigate the co-incidences and in some cases how could I? How could I have somehow steered a conversation to make someone aske me, "Have you trodden on a frog?" for example? But there's no easy way of knowing if I have an unusual amount of co-incidences or if I just notice them more than normal people ;0)<br /><br />One thing I have noted over the years is that the time 12:34 crops up on a fairly regular basis for me (but realistically, how many times do I look at digital clocks? 50 times a day maybe? Not <I>that</I> uncommon a time then). So it made me smile to note that your latest blog post, which ends, "I still consider myself pretty significant to all of you" was posted at 12:34pm. Yes, significant, I agree.themightychewhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15825891396769394628noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5310407.post-9189269734387374302009-05-27T21:33:44.124+01:002009-05-27T21:33:44.124+01:00Do coincidences cease to be coincidences when you are actively on the look out for them and hence likely to cause events to unfold such that they actually occur?Craighttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04345148174303127444noreply@blogger.com